Small Sailboat Diagram

Pentagon, the plane "vaporized"

Paul Attivissimo

During the debate I held last September 11th with Tom Woods on a conspiracy theory about the attacks in nine years ago was told by Wood that the second the "official" plane that hit the Pentagon would "vaporized" ( video ).

In fact in all these years of consultation and study of technical expertise and published reports by the experts claim Such has never been found by Undicisettembre in any technical document.

Even researchers who have designed Zero, the video Giulietto Church, does not seem to have been able to find the point where the "official" would have made this claim. In fact, in this Zero "steaming" alleged documented (so to speak) next to the image here, about 32 minutes from the start.

A simple text search on Google shows that it is a screenshot of a Web site, not a technical report. The website is DCMilitary.com, and the page address from which this screen is this. The original page is no longer available, but it is archived at Archive.org .

Just read to find out that this is an interview with an eyewitness, Frank Probst , and that the "steaming" mentioned refers only to an engine and still is not a literal description the explosion of the engine occurred at impact. Probst says that there were pieces of the same engine thrown in every direction, it is clear that vaporization does not speak literally.

"I was standing on the sidewalk (parallel to the site of impact) ... and I saw this plane coming right at me at what Seemed like 300 miles an hour. Towards the ground and where I watched this great big engine from this beautiful airplane just Vaporize , "Said Frank Probst, a member of the crew commented Pentagon renovations." It looked like a huge fireball, pieces Were flying out everywhere. "

These seem to be proof to the contrary, the slight vaporization of the origins of the thesis. No assertion techniques contained in the "official" but not a literal description of a witness, published on a website again, the plots were cultivated to give the "official" things that actually were invented to discredit them. Once again, been caught manipulating the truth that so often say they want to defend. It goes on like this for nine years.

Cruise With Babysitting

Firefighters for 9 / 11 Truth: If the firefighters say the plot

Attivissimo Paul, with contributions from Brain_Use and Hammer. The article was updated after initial publication.

Among the many groups who call themselves "for 9 / 11 truth" , namely the search for truth about September 11th, it stands out in particular: that of the firefighters, Firefighters for 9 / 11 Truth.

At first glance, the existence of an association of firefighters who support the conspiracy theory seems compelling evidence that something is wrong with the commonly accepted reconstruction of events. Who better than the fire can know whether the collapses of the Twin Towers was caused by the explosion of a controlled demolition or structural failure due to the combined effect of the impacts and fires?

But as always, when there is half of 11, stop at the first impression may be misleading. In fact, on Firefighters for 9 / 11 Truth, rather than authoritative and competent advice and analysis on the collapse of the Twin Towers and WTC 7 and attacks at the Pentagon, there is only technically meaningless and clearly anti-Semitic statements.

For example, the homepage of the website of this Declaration under the title "What is the evidence?" ("quali sono le prove?"):

We are asked to believe that on that day three structural steel buildings, which have never before in history collapsed because of fire , fell neatly into their basements at the speed of gravity, their concrete reduced to dust . We are asked to believe that jet fuel (kerosene) can melt steel . We are asked to believe that the most sophisticated air defense system in the world, that responded to sixty-eight emergencies in the year prior to 9-11 in less than twenty minutes allowed aircraft to wander about for up to an hour and a half. We are asked to believe that the steel and titanium components of an aircraft that supposedly hit the Pentagon “evaporated” . There is much, much more if anyone cares to look into it. Trade Tower #7 by itself is the “smoking gun”. Not hit by an aircraft, with only a few relatively small fires , it came down in a classic crimp and implosion, going straight into its basement, something only very precise demolition can accomplish, which takes days if not weeks to prepare. The 9-11 Commission didn’t even mention it , and F.E.M.A. actually stated they DIDN’T KNOW WHY IT COLLAPSED AND LEFT IT AT THAT.

Il repertorio è insomma quello standard del cospirazionismo: gli edifici in acciaio che non erano mai crollati first to fire ( false), the collapse in free fall ( false), the pulverization of the concrete ( even contradicted by Steven Jones), kerosene from the molten steel ( never claimed by the technical reports ), the 68 interceptions airline successfully completed the previous year (not on U.S. territory , and the minutes were not less than 20 ), the "evaporation" of the plane at the Pentagon ( ever affirmed by the technical reports ), small fires in WTC 7 ( false), the failure to mention WTC 7 by the Commission ( false) and the assertion that FEMA does not know why the WTC7 collapsed (true, but yes NIST).

This statement is attributed to Anton Vodvarka, described as "Lt. FDNY (ret)" . The acronym "FDNY" refers to it as a member of the firefighters of New York and then seems to indicate that Vodvarka has had direct experience of the attacks in New York. But the name does not appear in Vodvarka Anton ' list of firefighters present at the World Trade Center on September 11 . The clarification "ret." means "retired" , but does not specify how long Vodvarka has left the service. The site of Firefighters for 9 / 11 Truth adds that "Lt. Vodvarka served on FDNY Ladder Co 26, Rescue Co. 3, Rescue Co. 1, Engine Co. 92, Ladder 82 and Ladder 101. He was awarded the Merit Class 1 award, the Prentice Medal" , ma non dice quando.

Il sito FDNY Rescue Company 3 , che commemora gli otto vigili del fuoco della squadra periti nel WTC, indica che un Anton Vodvarka Jr. ricevette una medaglia nel 1969. Sembra quindi improbabile che Vodvarka (se si tratta della stessa persona) fosse in servizio attivo trentadue anni più tardi, nel 2001.

Di vera sostanza tecnica, insomma, non ce n'è. Anzi, bisogna chiedersi se i vigili del fuoco di New York che non hanno aderito a Firefighters for 9/11 Truth sono tutti stupidi per non essersi accorti di queste "prove" or if they even silence, as stated Jason Bermas (loose change). Firefighters who were there and who saw their comrades die in no doubt about the nature of the attacks and the dynamics of collapse. Gave them to only those who were not there. It does not seem a coincidence.

Not only join Firefighters for 9 / 11 Truth and enter the 'public list of subscribers is incredibly easy. So much so that Undicisettembre was able to join the list with different names entirely invented (which does not reveal). The undersigned, for instance, is the list of subscribers (even in the "other underwriters") even with first and last name and the status of membership ai Vigili di Vattelapesca.

C'è di peggio. Se si va a sfogliare le dichiarazioni dei sottoscrittori di Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, emergono soltanto asserzioni generiche, parole di solidarietà, lamentele geopolitiche e anche una dichiarazione inquietante.

Alexus Montraeus, Retired 15+ Years
"Find the truth. It was the jews."

"Sono stati gli ebrei" . Questa dichiarazione lapidaria, da sola, è un macigno che affonda ogni credibilità di questa sedicente associazione di vigili del fuoco che brilla per l'assenza eloquente dei pompieri che l'11/9 erano alle Torri Gemelle e al Pentagono.

Urine Glucose Testing Strips

It is true that WTC 7 is never mentioned in the report of Commission 11 / 9?

di Paolo Attivissimo

Uno dei presunti misteri spesso citati dai sostenitori delle tesi alternative è l'assenza di ogni riferimento al WTC7, la "terza torre" crollata al World Trade Center l'11 settembre 2001, nel Rapporto della Commissione 11/9. I rapporti tecnici di FEMA e NIST ne parlano estesamente, ma per qualche ragione il fatto che non sia citato nel Rapporto della Commissione, che è per forza di cose un sunto, ad alcuni pare strano.

In realtà chi fa quest'asserzione dimostra di aver ben poco talento per la ricerca. Infatti l'edificio è citato più volte nel Rapporto, solo che vi compare con la sigla “7 WTC” anziché “WTC7” .

Pagina 284: “The OEM' headquarters was located at 7 WTC. Some questioned locating it both so close to a previous terrorist target and on the 23rd floor of a building (difficult to access should elevators become inoperable). There was no backup site.”

Pagina 293: “By 8:48, officials in the OEM headquarters on the 23rd floor of 7 WTC – just to the north of the North Tower – began to activate the Emergency Operations Center by calling such agencies as the FDNY, NYPD, Department of Health, and the Greater Hospital Association and instructing them to send their designated representatives to the OEM.”

Pagina 302: “At about 9:57, an EMS paramedic approached the FDNY Chief of Department and advised that an engineer in front of 7 WTC had just remarked that the Twin Towers in fact were in imminent danger of a total collapse.”

Pagina 305: “After the South Tower was hit, OEM senior leadership decided to remain in its "bunker" and continue conducting operations, even though all civilians had been evacuated from 7 WTC. At approximately 9:30, a senior OEM official ordered the evacuation of the facility, after a Secret Service agent in 7 WTC advised him that additional commercial planes were not accounted for.”

Quello che manca, nel Rapporto, è un riferimento al crollo del WTC7. Ma il Rapporto non cita neppure quello del WTC3, il grande hotel Marriott, alto 22 piani, situato in fianco alle Torri Gemelle e distrutto completamente dal loro collasso, nonostante il fatto che la distruzione del WTC3 causò circa 40 morti.

Un bilancio del genere dovrebbe fare del crollo del WTC3 un evento significativo, ben più di quello del WTC7 che non provocò neppure una vittima (perché l'edificio, colpito dalle macerie delle Torri, era stato evacuato e delimitato da un perimetro di sicurezza proprio in previsione del suo crollo), eppure nel Rapporto della Commissione 11/9 non se ne fa mention. But this selective view of the conspiracy, not a mystery.

How Do I Tell Fake Onyx

WTC7, news footage of the fire

Paul Attivissimo

A video posted on YouTube by IC911Studies and coming from the archives of a local television station in New York is further clarity on the structural conditions of the "Third Tower", the building WTC7 or the Salomon Building , which according to some conspiracy theory would collapse in a suspicious way.

The video begins with the reporter (not identified, but a microphone with the logo of CBS, and the number 2) which describes the scene from inside a building whose windows were completely destroyed.

says he does not know exactly in which building is located, but note that behind him there is Barclay Street. Sequence is also visible in a corner of WTC 7, so it is likely that the Bank of New York Mellon , at the intersection of Washington Street and Barclay Street.

the map below, taken from Chapter 1 of FEMA, the building is circled in red and the direction of the frame is indicated by the arrow.

The reporter indicates a building and then to the right of WTC 7 WTC 7 WTC 7 indicates the same and while says "We do not know what this building is" ("we do not know what that building is) , confirming what was little known to journalists the secondary this skyscraper at the World Trade Center. Arising from this lack of familiarity with the various misunderstandings Aaron Brown (CNN) and Jane Standley (BBC) in the report if the building had collapsed or not.

The reporter adds that "Obviously they're on fire, maybe there's a chance That They Could collapse" : it says that the buildings have just said is clearly on fire and that perhaps could collapse. Once again, the words of reporter documenting widespread and obvious than it was suggested that other buildings, as well on the Twin Towers could yield.

The debris at the foot of WTC 7 indicate that the recovery goes back after the collapse of Torre Nord (WTC1) e dimostrano che le macerie di questo crollo giunsero fino al WTC7 e oltre.

Si nota inoltre che da numerosi piani del WTC7 esce fumo abbondante. A sinistra si possono vedere le file di finestre infrante sul lato nord (opposto alle Torri), dalle quali spiccano fiamme. Si odono anche rumori secchi, simili a scoppi, forse prodotti dalle macerie che si vedono cadere al suolo.

Il fumo è abbondantissimo anche sul lato corto opposto del WTC7, rivolto verso est.

Still images can not make the violence of the fire and the frantic rush of smoke. It is therefore advisable to watch the full video is available below.

Considering that WTC 7 was left to burn for hours without any intervention of the fire, does not seem so surprising that it collapsed. Surprisingly, if anything, that supporters of theses alternatives are so obsessed with it, because it is not clear what would have - the perspective of the theory of deliberate demolition as casus belli – distruggere un grattacielo minore (47 piani) che pochi conoscevano quando la devastazione di due edifici iconici come le Torri Gemelle era più che sufficiente a creare uno shock fortissimo nell'opinione pubblica.